Skip to content

Flang: Add support for Cray pointers in OpenMP constructs #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kiranktp
Copy link
Owner

@kiranktp kiranktp commented Jan 9, 2025

@coderabbitai

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added test case for Cray pointer usage in OpenMP parallel regions.
  • Tests

    • Introduced a new test subroutine test_crayptr demonstrating Cray pointer behavior with different OpenMP sharing attributes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of Cray pointers in OpenMP construct resolution to prevent unintended symbol flag updates.

…sharing attributes

Issue description:
	When DEFAULT DSA is NONE, all data refs must be listed in one of the data sharing clause.
	When a Cray pointer is listed in one of the data sharing clause, Cray pointee can be used in parallel region.
	This is valid as per standard.
	"Cray pointees have the same data-sharing attribute as the storage with which their Cray pointers are associated."
        Currently compiler crashes for default(none).
        Also current semantic checks incorrectly updates the symbol flags related to Craypointee symbols.
        due to this incorrect updation, compiler crashes when default(private) and default(firstprivate) is specified.

Solution:
        Added an additional check to skip updation of symbol flags related to Craypointee symbols.
        This also prevents from checking cray pointee when DEFAULT DSA is NONE.

This patch has code changes and a test case.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the Flang compiler's handling of Cray pointers in OpenMP constructs. A change in the resolve-directives.cpp file modifies the OmpAttributeVisitor::Post method to add a special check for Cray Pointee symbols. A corresponding test file cray-pointer-usage.f90 is added to validate the behavior of Cray pointers in different OpenMP parallel region configurations.

Changes

File Change Summary
flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp Added conditional check to early return for CrayPointee symbols in OpenMP attribute processing
flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/cray-pointer-usage.f90 New test subroutine test_crayptr demonstrating Cray pointer behavior in OpenMP parallel regions

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Compiler
    participant OmpAttributeVisitor
    participant Symbol
    
    Compiler->>OmpAttributeVisitor: Process OpenMP Attributes
    OmpAttributeVisitor->>Symbol: Check Symbol Type
    alt Is CrayPointee
        OmpAttributeVisitor-->>Compiler: Early Return
    else Not CrayPointee
        OmpAttributeVisitor->>Symbol: Continue Processing
    end
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Cray Pointers

In OpenMP's parallel dance,
Cray pointers take a special stance
With early returns so neat and clean,
No warnings, no fuss, a compiler's dream!
Hopping through code with magical might 🚀

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review.

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@kiranktp
Copy link
Owner Author

kiranktp commented Jan 9, 2025

@coderabbitai help

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

@kiranktp
Copy link
Owner Author

kiranktp commented Jan 9, 2025

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title @coderabbitai Flang: Add support for Cray pointers in OpenMP constructs Jan 9, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/cray-pointer-usage.f90 (2)

12-26: Consider enhancing test coverage and verification.

While the parallel regions effectively test different data-sharing combinations, consider these improvements:

  1. Add explicit value verification instead of just printing
  2. Add synchronization between parallel regions
  3. Include a test case for threadprivate

Example addition for threadprivate:

  !$omp threadprivate(ivar)
  !$omp parallel num_threads(2)
    print *, var(1)
  !$omp end parallel

1-29: Consider structured test result verification.

While the test effectively covers various OpenMP data-sharing attributes with Cray pointers, consider implementing a more structured verification approach:

  1. Add expected results as comments
  2. Implement result validation instead of print statements
  3. Consider using OpenMP critical sections for deterministic output

Example structured verification:

  real*8 :: expected_value = 42.0
  logical :: test_passed = .true.
  !$omp parallel num_threads(2) default(none) shared(ivar, test_passed, expected_value)
    !$omp critical
      if (var(1) /= expected_value) then
        test_passed = .false.
      endif
    !$omp end critical
  !$omp end parallel
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between aba6bb0 and 127024c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp (1 hunks)
  • flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/cray-pointer-usage.f90 (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp (1)

2245-2260: LGTM! The special handling for Cray pointers is correct.

The changes properly handle Cray pointers by skipping flag updates when a symbol has the CrayPointee flag set, while still preserving the DEFAULT(NONE) clause validation. This prevents unnecessary symbol flag modifications for Cray pointers in OpenMP constructs.

flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/cray-pointer-usage.f90 (2)

1-8: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.

The test configuration and variable declarations are correct. The use of test_errors.py with -fopenmp flag ensures proper OpenMP directive validation.


9-11: LGTM! Correct pointer initialization sequence.

The initialization of the pointee array and Cray pointer setup using loc() follows the standard pattern.

kiranktp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2025
…StrictPackMatch field (llvm#126215)

This addresses the MSAN failure reported
in
llvm#125791 (comment):
```
==5633==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 in clang::ASTNodeImporter::CallOverloadedCreateFun<clang::ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl>::operator()
    #1 in bool clang::ASTNodeImporter::GetImportedOrCreateSpecialDecl<...>
...
```

The ASTImporter reads `D->hasStrictPackMatch()` and forwards it to the
constructor of the destination `ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl`. But if
`D` is a decl that LLDB created from debug-info, it would've been
created using `ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl::CreateDeserialized`,
which doesn't initialize the `StrictPackMatch` field.

This patch just initializes the field to a fixed value of `false`, to
preserve previous behaviour and avoid the use-of-uninitialized-value.

An alternative would be to always initialize it in the
`ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl` constructor, but there were
reservations about providing a default value for it because it might
lead to hard-to-diagnose problems down the line.
kiranktp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2025
We can't guaranty that underlying string is
0-terminated and [String.size()] is even in the
same allocation.


https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/94/builds/4152/steps/17/logs/stdio
```
==c-index-test==1846256==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0  in clang::cxstring::createRef(llvm::StringRef) llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:96:36
    #1  in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:521:39
    llvm#2  in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7
    llvm#3  in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7
    llvm#4  in DumpCXComment llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:685:3
    llvm#5  in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:768:7

  Memory was marked as uninitialized
    #0  in __msan_allocated_memory llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1023:5
    #1  in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:172:7
    llvm#2  in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:216:12
    llvm#3  in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:53:43
    llvm#4  in Allocate<char> llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:76:29
    llvm#5  in convertCodePointToUTF8 llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:42:30
    llvm#6  in clang::comments::Lexer::resolveHTMLDecimalCharacterReference(llvm::StringRef) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:76:10
    llvm#7  in clang::comments::Lexer::lexHTMLCharacterReference(clang::comments::Token&) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:615:16
    llvm#8  in consumeToken llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/CommentParser.h:62:9
    llvm#9  in clang::comments::Parser::parseParagraphOrBlockCommand() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp
    llvm#10 in clang::comments::Parser::parseFullComment() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp:925:22
    llvm#11 in clang::RawComment::parse(clang::ASTContext const&, clang::Preprocessor const*, clang::Decl const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/RawCommentList.cpp:221:12
    llvm#12 in clang::ASTContext::getCommentForDecl(clang::Decl const*, clang::Preprocessor const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:714:35
    llvm#13 in clang_Cursor_getParsedComment llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXComment.cpp:36:35
    llvm#14 in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:756:25
 ```
kiranktp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
… without debug-info" (llvm#137757)

Reverts llvm#137408

This change broke `lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/split-machine-functions.test`.

The test binary has a symbol named `_Z3foov.cold` and the test expects
the backtrace to print the name of the cold part of the function like
this:

```
# SPLIT: frame #1: {{.*}}`foo() (.cold) +
```
but now it gets

```
frame #1: 0x000055555555514f split-machine-functions.test.tmp`foo() + 12
```
kiranktp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
…gger memory is updated (llvm#129092)"

This reverts commit daa4061.

Original PR llvm#129092.

I have restricted the test to X86 Windows because it turns out the only
reason that `expr x.get()` would change m_memory_id is that on x86 we
have to write the return address to the stack in ABIWindows_X86_64::PrepareTrivialCall:
```
  // Save return address onto the stack
  if (!process_sp->WritePointerToMemory(sp, return_addr, error))
    return false;
```

This is not required on AArch64 so m_memory_id was not changed:
```
(lldb) expr x.get()
(int) $0 = 0
(lldb) process status -d
Process 15316 stopped
* thread #1, stop reason = Exception 0x80000003 encountered at address 0x7ff764a31034
    frame #0: 0x00007ff764a31038 TestProcessModificationIdOnExpr.cpp.tmp`main at TestProcessModificationIdOnExpr.cpp:35
   32     __builtin_debugtrap();
   33     __builtin_debugtrap();
   34     return 0;
-> 35   }
   36
   37   // CHECK-LABEL: process status -d
   38   // CHECK: m_stop_id: 2
ProcessModID:
  m_stop_id: 3
  m_last_natural_stop_id: 0
  m_resume_id: 0
  m_memory_id: 0
```

Really we should find a better way to force a memory write here, but
I can't think of one right now.
kiranktp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
we already check for `platform_sp` not null in one line below. 

existing code
```
if (platform_sp) {
      Status error;
      if (platform_sp) {
...
...
     }
}
```

`platform_sp` null check is redundant and error variable is unused. 

### TEST PLAN 
manual test 

```
satyajanga@devvm21837:toolchain $ ./bin/lldb
LLDB logging initialized. Logs stored in: /tmp
(lldb) platform select host
  Platform: host
    Triple: x86_64-*-linux-gnu
OS Version: 6.9.0 (6.9.0-0_fbk5_hardened_1_gf368ae920c1a)
  Hostname: 127.0.0.1
WorkingDir: /home/satyajanga/llvm-sand/build/Debug/fbcode-x86_64/toolchain
    Kernel: #1 SMP Tue Feb 11 07:24:41 PST 2025
    Kernel: Linux
   Release: 6.9.0-0_fbk5_hardened_1_gf368ae920c1a
   Version: #1 SMP Tue Feb 11 07:24:41 PST 2025
(lldb) platform process list
144 matching processes were found on "host"

PID    PARENT USER       TRIPLE                         NAME
====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================
130461 874915 satyajanga x86_64-*-linux-gnu             sushd
135505 874915 satyajanga x86_64-*-linux-gnu             hg.real
817146 874915 satyajanga x86_64-*-linux-gnu             vscode-thrift
874915 1      satyajanga                                
874947 874915 satyajanga                                
```

and running the existing tests
```
satyajanga@devvm21837:toolchain $ ./bin/llvm-lit -v  ~/llvm-sand/external/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/commands/platform/
-- Testing: 9 tests, 9 workers --
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/file/read/TestPlatformFileRead.py (1 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/file/close/TestPlatformFileClose.py (2 of 9)
UNSUPPORTED: lldb-api :: commands/platform/sdk/TestPlatformSDK.py (3 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/basic/TestPlatformPython.py (4 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/basic/TestPlatformCommand.py (5 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/connect/TestPlatformConnect.py (6 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/process/launch/TestPlatformProcessLaunch.py (7 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/launchgdbserver/TestPlatformLaunchGDBServer.py (8 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/process/list/TestProcessList.py (9 of 9)

Testing Time: 13.48s

Total Discovered Tests: 9
  Unsupported: 1 (11.11%)
  Passed     : 8 (88.89%)
satyajanga@devvm21837:toolchain $ 
```
kiranktp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
llvm#138091)

Check this error for more context
(https://github.com/compiler-research/CppInterOp/actions/runs/14749797085/job/41407625681?pr=491#step:10:531)

This fails with 
```
* thread #1, name = 'CppInterOpTests', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: address not mapped to object (fault address: 0x55500356d6d3)
  * frame #0: 0x00007fffee41cfe3 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::PragmaNamespace::~PragmaNamespace() + 99
    frame #1: 0x00007fffee435666 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Preprocessor::~Preprocessor() + 3830
    frame llvm#2: 0x00007fffee20917a libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitstd::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() + 58
    frame llvm#3: 0x00007fffee224796 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::CompilerInstance::~CompilerInstance() + 838
    frame llvm#4: 0x00007fffee22494d libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::CompilerInstance::~CompilerInstance() + 13
    frame llvm#5: 0x00007fffed95ec62 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser::~IncrementalCUDADeviceParser() + 98
    frame llvm#6: 0x00007fffed9551b6 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Interpreter::~Interpreter() + 102
    frame llvm#7: 0x00007fffed95598d libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Interpreter::~Interpreter() + 13
    frame llvm#8: 0x00007fffed9181e7 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitcompat::createClangInterpreter(std::vector<char const*, std::allocator<char const*>>&) + 2919
```

Problem : 

1) The destructor currently handles no clearance for the DeviceParser
and the DeviceAct. We currently only have this

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/976493822443c52a71ed3c67aaca9a555b20c55d/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp#L416-L419

2) The ownership for DeviceCI currently is present in
IncrementalCudaDeviceParser. But this should be similar to how the
combination for hostCI, hostAction and hostParser are managed by the
Interpreter. As on master the DeviceAct and DeviceParser are managed by
the Interpreter but not DeviceCI. This is problematic because :
IncrementalParser holds a Sema& which points into the DeviceCI. On
master, DeviceCI is destroyed before the base class ~IncrementalParser()
runs, causing Parser::reset() to access a dangling Sema (and as Sema
holds a reference to Preprocessor which owns PragmaNamespace) we see
this
```
  * frame #0: 0x00007fffee41cfe3 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::PragmaNamespace::~PragmaNamespace() + 99
    frame #1: 0x00007fffee435666 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Preprocessor::~Preprocessor() + 3830
    
```
kiranktp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
When running the `openmp` testsuite on Solaris/amd64, many tests `FAIL`
like

```
# | OMP: Error llvm#11: Stack overflow detected for OpenMP thread #1
```

In a `Debug` build, I also get
```
# | Assertion failure at kmp_runtime.cpp(203): __kmp_gtid_get_specific() < 0 || __kmp_gtid_get_specific() == i.
```

Further investigation shows that just setting `__kmp_gtid_mode` to 3
massively reduces the number of failures.

Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11` and `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`.
kiranktp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
Fix for:
`Assertion failed: (false && "Architecture or OS not supported"),
function CreateRegisterContextForFrame, file
/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/elf-core/ThreadElfCore.cpp,
line 182.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ and
include the crash backtrace.
#0 0x000000080cd857c8 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&,
int)
/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:13
#1 0x000000080cd85ed4
/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:797:3
llvm#2 0x000000080cd82ae8 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers()
/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:104:5
llvm#3 0x000000080cd861f0 SignalHandler
/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:403:3 llvm#4
0x000000080f159644 handle_signal
/usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_sig.c:298:3
`
kiranktp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2025
The mcmodel=tiny memory model is only valid on ARM targets. While trying
this on X86 compiler throws an internal error along with stack dump.
llvm#125641
This patch resolves the issue.
Reduced test case:
```
#include <stdio.h>
int main( void )
{
printf( "Hello, World!\n" ); 
return 0; 
}
```
```
0.	Program arguments: /opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang++ -gdwarf-4 -g -o /app/output.s -fno-verbose-asm -S --gcc-toolchain=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot -fcolor-diagnostics -fno-crash-diagnostics -mcmodel=tiny <source>
1.	<eof> parser at end of file
 #0 0x0000000003b10218 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b10218)
 #1 0x0000000003b0e35c llvm::sys::CleanupOnSignal(unsigned long) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b0e35c)
 llvm#2 0x0000000003a5dbc3 llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::HandleExit(int) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a5dbc3)
 llvm#3 0x0000000003b05cfe llvm::sys::Process::Exit(int, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b05cfe)
 llvm#4 0x0000000000d4e3eb LLVMErrorHandler(void*, char const*, bool) cc1_main.cpp:0:0
 llvm#5 0x0000000003a67c93 llvm::report_fatal_error(llvm::Twine const&, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a67c93)
 llvm#6 0x0000000003a67df8 (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a67df8)
 llvm#7 0x0000000002549148 llvm::X86TargetMachine::X86TargetMachine(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, std::optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, std::optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOptLevel, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x2549148)
 llvm#8 0x00000000025491fc llvm::RegisterTargetMachine<llvm::X86TargetMachine>::Allocator(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, std::optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, std::optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOptLevel, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x25491fc)
 llvm#9 0x0000000003db74cc clang::emitBackendOutput(clang::CompilerInstance&, clang::CodeGenOptions&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module*, clang::BackendAction, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::FileSystem>, std::unique_ptr<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream, std::default_delete<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream>>, clang::BackendConsumer*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3db74cc)
llvm#10 0x0000000004460d95 clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4460d95)
llvm#11 0x00000000060005ec clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x60005ec)
llvm#12 0x00000000044614b5 clang::CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction() (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x44614b5)
llvm#13 0x0000000004737121 clang::FrontendAction::Execute() (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4737121)
llvm#14 0x00000000046b777b clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x46b777b)
llvm#15 0x00000000048229e3 clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x48229e3)
llvm#16 0x0000000000d50621 cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd50621)
llvm#17 0x0000000000d48e2d ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&, llvm::ToolContext const&) driver.cpp:0:0
llvm#18 0x00000000044acc99 void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<clang::driver::CC1Command::Execute(llvm::ArrayRef<std::optional<llvm::StringRef>>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>*, bool*) const::'lambda'()>(long) Job.cpp:0:0
llvm#19 0x0000000003a5dac3 llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a5dac3)
llvm#20 0x00000000044aceb9 clang::driver::CC1Command::Execute(llvm::ArrayRef<std::optional<llvm::StringRef>>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>*, bool*) const (.part.0) Job.cpp:0:0
llvm#21 0x00000000044710dd clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteCommand(clang::driver::Command const&, clang::driver::Command const*&, bool) const (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x44710dd)
llvm#22 0x0000000004472071 clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteJobs(clang::driver::JobList const&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&, bool) const (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4472071)
llvm#23 0x000000000447c3fc clang::driver::Driver::ExecuteCompilation(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x447c3fc)
llvm#24 0x0000000000d4d2b1 clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd4d2b1)
llvm#25 0x0000000000c12464 main (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xc12464)
llvm#26 0x00007ae43b029d90 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29d90)
llvm#27 0x00007ae43b029e40 __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29e40)
llvm#28 0x0000000000d488c5 _start (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd488c5)
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Shashwathi N <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant